Fauna section revisited

I'm doing a rather big overhaul of the fauna in the wiki at the moment.
I plan to divide it more logically into different terrain type

Basically : Jungle - Marsh - Aquatic - Rough terrain - dungeon or man-made terrain - and maybe plains and ice environnment.

So it means I'm displacing a lot of stuff, including credits, so please check once the move is done, so I haven't forgotten you !
Don't hesitate if you have any remark, or notived a broken link or so ^_^

Also, (I was planning to do this in the Flash wiki), it would be good to have an index of all the fauna, arranged alphabetically. This would help a lot when trying to locate a specific creature.

Anime-Junkie wrote:

Also, (I was planning to do this in the Flash wiki), it would be good to have an index of all the fauna, arranged alphabetically. This would help a lot when trying to locate a specific creature.

Hey,

Wikipedia has these. They're quite useful, and articles can appear in many such index. However, I think they're probably a time-consuming thing to create, so with Karbo (and a few others?) being the only ones editing the wiki, I'm not so sure its the place for him (them?) to invest their resources. If you know the name of what you're looking for, you can use the 'find' feature - but its a pain to do this with more than one page.

Yeah, so I don't know what to think.

Yours,

Ambrose,

PS like what you've done with the rearrangement though Karbo.

ambrose-euanthe wrote:

Wikipedia has these. They're quite useful, and articles can appear in many such index. However, I think they're probably a time-consuming thing to create, so with Karbo (and a few others?) being the only ones editing the wiki, I'm not so sure its the place for him (them?) to invest their resources.

True, It was just a suggestion

Anyway, I agree with ambrose, the changes are very good, the Fauna section is much more organised.

thank you, glad you like it

Honnestly arranging them alphabetically would be a huge work with not that much of an improvement in the end I think ^^; ( they are still organized by location )

arranging them alphabetically would actually serve to make it harder to find what you're looking for, unless we're talking alphabetical within the area arrangement.

I didn't mean arranging them alphabetically, just making an index with links to the articles containing them.