Wiki corrections

Kind of a contradiction in Drayla's page. It says that her mobility is fixed, but her same page does mention that she can uproot herself, so she would be able to move around.

Sean Okotami wrote:

Kind of a contradiction in Drayla's page. It says that her mobility is fixed, but her same page does mention that she can uproot herself, so she would be able to move around.

I think it means that, like other dryads, she has the ability to uproot herself if she really wants to, but she normally has a fixed location.

Dryads who uproot themselves normally do so to fix themselves more or less permanently elsewhere. You don't actually see dryads wandering around for any other reason.

So there's no real contradiction.

It's could be interpreted as such.

I noticed on Leppy's page it says she's a safe predator, yet in her bio it says she eats people, I think this should be fixed up ASAP.

French snack wrote:

Sean Okotami wrote:

Kind of a contradiction in Drayla's page. It says that her mobility is fixed, but her same page does mention that she can uproot herself, so she would be able to move around.

I think it means that, like other dryads, she has the ability to uproot herself if she really wants to, but she normally has a fixed location.

Dryads who uproot themselves normally do so to fix themselves more or less permanently elsewhere. You don't actually see dryads wandering around for any other reason.

So there's no real contradiction.

Yep

...Until you get into the "legged dryads" that are mentioned on the dryad page, which is a whole other issue to deal with. They've never actually been canonically defined yet. Personally, I don't see the point of them. I don't have any issues with dryads uprooting themselves and crawling around on their roots, or twisting their roots to crudely imitate legs...but a full-on dryad, with legs, who can walk wherever she wants with ease, that just doesn't seem like a dryad anymore. To me, anyway. It'd be like saying "My character is a mermaid. But, she's barely ever in the water and walks around on land using her legs."

Yeah, fair point. Remember though, traditional dryads have human legs.

Archmage_Bael wrote:

Yeah, fair point. Remember though, traditional dryads have human legs.

Weren't traditional dryads more nymph-like spirits of nature? Instead of a human/tree hybrid like ours are?

Yeah, they were bonded to trees. Hamadryads were the only dryads that couldn't move from the tree without the tree dying.

ash trees - Meliai.
apple trees - Epimeliad
walnuttrees - Caryatids

something like that.

In the Topazial Sea page, it says that there are volasaurus as part of its fauna. However, there are no entry about them in the actual fauna page, and it hyperlinks to the aquatic fauna still.

Sean Okotami wrote:

In the Topazial Sea page, it says that there are volasaurus as part of its fauna. However, there are no entry about them in the actual fauna page, and it hyperlinks to the aquatic fauna still.

Good catch. The volasaurus was never developed, and was removed from the fauna page months ago. I've removed the link from the two pages where it still appeared.

on a similar note Elle is said to wear a bikini of an obrak beast when there is no article in the wiki on such a creature, or perhaps i simply haven't found it yet.

EvilGenius wrote:

on a similar note Elle is said to wear a bikini of an obrak beast when there is no article in the wiki on such a creature, or perhaps i simply haven't found it yet.

The only thing you need to know about obrak beasts is that they have fur like a leopard, and enough of it to make Elle a bikini.

Also, they don't live in Felarya, they live in Dorontu.


WTFFF... AWE"#EASD

Awita waiat awrr.

Wait a moment. "Obrak"... Isn't that Karbo backwards? She skinned Karbo? That bitch!

P.S: Seriously, I just noticed the pun now...

o.o

I know somebody who have some explaining to do XD

LOOOOL!!!

aethernavale wrote:

Is it just for me, or did the Felarya Wiki left/side panel navigation suddenly bail out? It seems to be present all the way down at the bottom of the page when viewed from Mozilla Firefox 9.0.

It does still appear correctly in Google Chrome 15.0.874.120 m and MIE 9.0.8112.16421 from my testing. Can post pictures if necessary.

The issue I was experiencing while viewing the wiki with FireFox has apparently been corrected by updating the browser to the next revision. I am currently using Firefox 10.0 and the minibar / navigation panel is back to the correct orientation in the page.

Still no idea why it only affected the Felaryan wiki - my guess still relates to it being some coding issue that FF either didn't know how to handle or had some broken piece that caused the coding for this particular shell to be misrepresented as it was.

Regardless, the issue appears fixed now. Recommend any users experiencing this issue to upgrade their current FF version to the latest, as that should correct it. If not, well, no ideas here.

Alright this wording on the wiki page seems to be contrary on Anko's hunting habits to a point. "Thankfully, the big bad mermaid is not as voracious as her terrible reputation makes her to be, and she actually feeds a lot on fish." now I may just be confused here.

But it says that Anko is a Specialized predator and prefers humans, yet her bio also says as stated above she prefers to mainly hunt fish, it overall seems very misguiding I mean does she commonly go out of her way to hunt humans if she's Specialized, or does she prefer to go after fish which I think would make her less dangerous like Opportunistic? It just seems rather confusing and I think something needs to be done about it.

Solomon wrote:

Alright this wording on the wiki page seems to be contrary on Anko's hunting habits to a point. "Thankfully, the big bad mermaid is not as voracious as her terrible reputation makes her to be, and she actually feeds a lot on fish." now I may just be confused here.

But it says that Anko is a Specialized predator and prefers humans, yet her bio also says as stated above she prefers to mainly hunt fish, it overall seems very misguiding I mean does she commonly go out of her way to hunt humans if she's Specialized, or foes prefers to go after fish which I think would make her less dangerous like ? It just seems rather confusing and I think something needs to be done about it.

Mermaids can't go out of their way to hunt humans, since they are confined to the water. Their diet would mostly be fish, and they'd only really get the chance to eat a human very rarely, whenever someone was stupid enough to go/get too close to the water, or try to cross her bridge.

EDIT: Oh, great. They added the "vore ratings"... Such a pointless idea.

I just took a look at the Great Marshes page and noticed it forgot to mention slug-girl in the inhabitants list, I say slug-girl because the only one I know of in the location is Timing2's Marsha. But it might be slug-girls because I think the race does commonly live in the general location, I think it needs to have slug-girl(s) added to the inhabitants list.

rcs619 wrote:

EDIT: Oh, great. They added the "vore ratings"... Such a pointless idea.

Seeing how I suggested the idea awhile ago, I take a bit of offence to that statement, anyway off topic.

Could someone please let it be know if slug-girl(s) live in the marsh or not (which I think by all rights they would)

Solomon wrote:

Alright this wording on the wiki page seems to be contrary on Anko's hunting habits ... It just seems rather confusing and I think something needs to be done about it.

Yeah, that is a bit confusing. Maybe Anko's habits have changed since her character was created, but the wiki did not get fully updated?

rcs619 wrote:

Mermaids can't go out of their way to hunt humans, since they are confined to the water.

I have to disagree. In this context "go out of their way" would mean something like "spends most of their time in areas where they are likely to encounter humans, rather than in areas where they are most likely to get fish." Being "trapped" in the water just limits their options, it doesn't remove them entirely.

Solomon wrote:

I just took a look at the Great Marshes page and noticed it forgot to mention slug-girl in the inhabitants list, I say slug-girl because the only one I know of in the location is Timing2's Marsha. But it might be slug-girls because I think the race does commonly live in the general location, I think it needs to have slug-girl(s) added to the inhabitants list.

Slugs living in a marsh sounds right to me, at least.

I took a look at the inhabitants list of the area called Malyra fen, in the Great Marshes, and it says there are Beasts of the Past, along with warrior women *which could be human amazons* along with nekos and elves. Now if it says these things are in the area, then why aren't they in the inhabitants list?

Just something I think needs looked at is all.

In the Selachis entry 3rd paragraph, 6th sentence (just past the middle).

"It is worth noting that selachis can tell their own teeth from any other selachi or sea cretinous, provided they have taken a close look at one of their own, and get a good look at one claimed to belong to them."

I would think "sea cretinous" is supposed to be sea creatures.

Thanks; fixed.

The wiki still does not have a link to the new tome on the index.

Was trying to find out more about oosoon berries (as depicted on this page) but there doesn't seem to be any other reference to them? From the picture I'm assuming they have some sort of intoxicating/liberating effect but can't find any entry about them.

Okay, I can't explain their makeup like Asaenvolk can. He's the one that they belong to. I don't think the liquid in those berries are straight up water, but they contain some sort of fluid I think that has a much stronger reaction to fairies than any other species. So fairies get drunk easily from them. Ace should have more details. Unfortunately, and for some reason I can't explain, they don't have a section in the wiki with those other fruits. >_<