| General Q and A | |
|
+75Darth_Nergal Emerald Electronic Oldman40k2003 Venom Agato vore4life99 DaNoob13 DarkOne Ilceren McKindle 2Ron2R AzureJass HeavenlessStar Boris92 Malahite hhhat09 FalconJudge jedi-explorer EvilGenius parameciumkid Paltiel Greyman timing2 Rezec /Fish/ Tango Beefnautz Pendragon sadisticnerd Axel Hunter Archmage_Bael MrNobody13 Darkstorm Zero Black Aquila ZionAtriedes Iavlas Silent_eric TryMeIke French snack Saironthis walkingbyself Black Hole Fragment Primeval Hunter Nyaha Krisexy26 gwadahunter2222 Vaderaz zersergathant TheArchvile TheLightLost AisuKaiko itsmeyouidiot CauldronBorn24 Slimetoad Feadraug Amaroq macdaddy The Ultimate Claire sparkythechu Pim18 Jasconius kikijonson Anime-Junkie luke112 aethernavale Shady Knight buddha66667 Prof.Nekko Karbo Jætte_Troll Solomon Sehoolighan Grave rcs619 Stabs 79 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
French snack Moderator
Posts : 1192 Join date : 2009-04-05 Location : in Milly's stomach. Care to join me?
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:00 pm | |
| - Slimetoad wrote:
That...must be a very awkward situation on Milly's part She's had time to get used it. It probably feels natural to her by now - watching very carefully where she treads, and talking to very tiny people. - Stabs wrote:
Discerning a tiny at 30 metres tall wouldn't be as difficult as it looks. Pardon the pun.
Assuming a tiny is 7 cm tall, that means it's 1/400 roughly of her size. Now, to a 1.6 metres tall person, 1/400 portions of their size is 4 mm, or roughlly the size of a small ant. Depending on how good your eyesight is, you can spot a lone ant if it's against a background of the appropriate color. If it's not, then its movements could clue you to that not being exactly an ant, specially with experience. Oh, indeed, they're certainly visible. But she does have to look out for them. - Quote :
Anndd... be careful, there's SCIENCE involved in the next part!
- The More You Know:
As I'm sure you can ask any physics professor, the human ear has a logarhytmic perception of sound. That's why we measure sounds, when the exact energy content is not important, in decibeliums. They're a measure of the logarhytm of the amount of energy per square metre, adjusted by the frequency of the sound- but let's ignore that part for now. But here's the keyword- logarhytm. Assuming a person 1000 times smaller (in mass) could create a sound with a thousandth part of the energy, that means the sound is only 30 decibeliums lower. Assuming a person were a million times smaller and a direct proportion between mass and energy, you'd get a sound 60 decibeliums lower (10 decibeliums are one decimal order of magnitude). Assuming a person were 468 million times smaller, you'd get a sound around 82 decibeliums lower.
BUT, that'd be assuming Milly can't hear anything under 41 decibeliums, because it takes around 10000 times the noise for her to be able to discern it. She ain't deaf! If her hearing is at least as good as yours, then she should be able to hear anything you should- meaning a net loss of only 41 decibeliums. A yell can reach 90 decibeliums, which, minus 41, would be 49 decibeliums. Roughly the sound of a crowd, or enough to attract her attention.
From there, use the square/linear law: the energy carried per unit of surface in a soundwave is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. So at half the distance, you hear it with four times the energy- and at 1/8 of the distance, you hear it with roughly 1000 times the energy, or almost 10 decibeliums higher.
And I dunno if you should trust a direct proportion between sound volume and size either. There's always those tiny effin' insects that make enough ruckus to drive ya to manslaughter, after all!
Ooh, science! And some very convenient science, at that. Thanks for the calculations. | |
|
| |
Nyaha Eternal Optimist
Posts : 3845 Join date : 2007-12-09 Age : 31 Location : Canada. ^.^ Goooooo Snow!
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:35 pm | |
| I have a good question: Do sea krait nagas have underbelly scales like normal nagas do? | |
|
| |
Shady Knight Lord of the Elements
Posts : 4580 Join date : 2008-01-20 Age : 34
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:37 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Nyaha Eternal Optimist
Posts : 3845 Join date : 2007-12-09 Age : 31 Location : Canada. ^.^ Goooooo Snow!
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Sat Mar 10, 2012 5:01 pm | |
| Since Felarya has no 'outer space', does that mean it doesn't have an atmosphere either? And if so, does that mean that air doesn't get thinner as elevation goes higher? | |
|
| |
Anime-Junkie Loremaster
Posts : 2690 Join date : 2007-12-16 Age : 31 Location : The Country of Kangaroos and Criminal Scum
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Sat Mar 10, 2012 5:18 pm | |
| It's definitely got an atmosphere. More detail here. | |
|
| |
jedi-explorer Felarya cartographer
Posts : 1474 Join date : 2011-12-06 Age : 36 Location : Fantasy Land ^_^
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:59 pm | |
| Okay here's a question. The Healing magic of Felarya is in it's soil, but if you take the soil out of Felarya it beomces regular soil. Is there something you could trap the healing magic of Felarya in to use on other worlds? | |
|
| |
Shady Knight Lord of the Elements
Posts : 4580 Join date : 2008-01-20 Age : 34
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:28 am | |
| Soil outside of Felarya loses 80% of its healing properties. | |
|
| |
jedi-explorer Felarya cartographer
Posts : 1474 Join date : 2011-12-06 Age : 36 Location : Fantasy Land ^_^
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:45 pm | |
| - Sean Okotami wrote:
- Soil outside of Felarya loses 80% of its healing properties.
So that makes it how effective? | |
|
| |
Stabs Moderator
Posts : 1875 Join date : 2009-10-15 Age : 34 Location : The Coil, Miragia
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:49 pm | |
| - jedi-explorer wrote:
- Sean Okotami wrote:
- Soil outside of Felarya loses 80% of its healing properties.
So that makes it how effective? That's not something there is a definite answer on: you'll have to decide on how effective 20% is by yourself. | |
|
| |
itsmeyouidiot Marauder of the deep jungle
Posts : 385 Join date : 2009-07-27 Age : 32 Location : The Pit
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:43 pm | |
| Are succubi capable of having children with other species?
...Just felt like asking this for no particular reason whatsoever. No reason at all. | |
|
| |
Archmage_Bael Mara's snack
Posts : 4158 Join date : 2009-05-05 Age : 36 Location : Shatterock Caldera
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:25 am | |
| Probably, they are demons of sex. Even if they cant do it naturally, I bet there could be some sort of impregnation-helping magic they use. | |
|
| |
walkingbyself Great warrior
Posts : 453 Join date : 2011-02-15 Age : 35 Location : United States
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:37 am | |
| - Archmage_Bael wrote:
- Probably, they are demons of sex. Even if they cant do it naturally, I bet there could be some sort of impregnation-helping magic they use.
Hm me thinks something around the lines of Harpies in terms of reproduction. Or Asari from Mass Effect. (yes I included a game species so sue me) | |
|
| |
Archmage_Bael Mara's snack
Posts : 4158 Join date : 2009-05-05 Age : 36 Location : Shatterock Caldera
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:43 am | |
| well I think the difference here would be because the harpies do it because they need to. succubi do it because they WANT to XD | |
|
| |
itsmeyouidiot Marauder of the deep jungle
Posts : 385 Join date : 2009-07-27 Age : 32 Location : The Pit
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:45 pm | |
| - Archmage_Bael wrote:
- Probably, they are demons of sex. Even if they cant do it naturally, I bet there could be some sort of impregnation-helping magic they use.
Ah, that's interesting... Not that this would ever have any sort of greater implication or anything. Nosiree. Nope, not at all. | |
|
| |
TheLightLost Survivor
Posts : 965 Join date : 2010-10-18 Location : Who cares anymore
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:08 pm | |
| - itsmeyouidiot wrote:
- Are succubi capable of having children with other species?
...Just felt like asking this for no particular reason whatsoever. No reason at all. That's an interesting question for me. Part of me says Succubi shouldn't be able to breed with most other species but then on the other hand, I created a species called Voluptas which is the offspring of Incubi and Harpies. It would be like a double standard for me to say no to your question, even given the nature of Harpies' reproduction. Hmmm. I guess if my feet were held to the fire I would still say no. Besides, I don't think the world could supply the demand for condoms if Succubi were capable of having children with other species. | |
|
| |
itsmeyouidiot Marauder of the deep jungle
Posts : 385 Join date : 2009-07-27 Age : 32 Location : The Pit
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:34 pm | |
| - gt500x wrote:
- itsmeyouidiot wrote:
- Are succubi capable of having children with other species?
...Just felt like asking this for no particular reason whatsoever. No reason at all. I guess if my feet were held to the fire I would still say no. Besides, I don't think the world could supply the demand for condoms if Succubi were capable of having children with other species. Succubi having children would probably involve using some sort of special magic. RATHER LARGE SPOILER WARNING: - Spoiler:
Tome 5 rather heavily implies that Vivian is part succubus. Somehow. She can eat spirits, and it would certainly explain a lot about her, um, everything.
| |
|
| |
TheLightLost Survivor
Posts : 965 Join date : 2010-10-18 Location : Who cares anymore
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:46 pm | |
| Well, now that you mention it, Vivian does have a lot of succubus traits. Karbo's probably been alluding to that for a while. The design on the staff she carries makes more sense now. But we should still assume the two species can't reproduce until Karbo eventually explains things. I'm not sure when he will though. It could be years later. | |
|
| |
Archmage_Bael Mara's snack
Posts : 4158 Join date : 2009-05-05 Age : 36 Location : Shatterock Caldera
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:31 pm | |
| When do fairies mature, age-wise? I can't remember... | |
|
| |
Stabs Moderator
Posts : 1875 Join date : 2009-10-15 Age : 34 Location : The Coil, Miragia
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:29 am | |
| - Archmage_Bael wrote:
- When do fairies mature, age-wise? I can't remember...
There is no official information on the subject. You may assume either a human timeframe, a predator timeframe (multiply by 3), a timeframe fleeting and ephemeral as the glow of a shooting star (but I've only seen that outside Felarya, in Petite-Emi's Calabi-Yau forest, where fairies hardly survive their first month, so there's, like, no way to know how long their lifespan is)... make up your own. We've seen both fairy children and fairy larvae, not to mention they're crazy 'nuff to breed outside their species and magical in nature- I'd say it varies from family to family. | |
|
| |
Shady Knight Lord of the Elements
Posts : 4580 Join date : 2008-01-20 Age : 34
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:48 am | |
| I actually talked about it with Karbo out of sheer curiosity. Apparently, one year and a half for a human is one year for a fairy in terms of aging, and two years for a human is about one year for an elf. | |
|
| |
itsmeyouidiot Marauder of the deep jungle
Posts : 385 Join date : 2009-07-27 Age : 32 Location : The Pit
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Sat Mar 17, 2012 8:32 pm | |
| I'm still wondering a bit how the blatant biological impossibility of Felarya's giant-sized life works.
Does Felarya have an intrinsic property that allows geometrically impossible anatomy despite the square-cube law? Or is it something the creatures themselves have?
Would a giant-sized Felaryan die if it went to another world where the square-cube law works like it does on Earth? | |
|
| |
Karbo Evil admin
Posts : 3812 Join date : 2007-12-08
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:36 am | |
| To be honest the square cube law is something that make Felarya or any world with giants impossible to start with and there is no real way around it. This is why trying to find a logic behind everything there is a bit pointless I think ^^; I actually had the idea to make a picture of a personized square cub law attacking Felarya once , titled " worst enemy" or something like that | |
|
| |
Anime-Junkie Loremaster
Posts : 2690 Join date : 2007-12-16 Age : 31 Location : The Country of Kangaroos and Criminal Scum
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:16 am | |
| Yeah, Karbo is right. One of the points of fantasy and science fiction as opposed to other types of fiction is that fantasy and sci-fi take certain rules, laws, etc of the real world and disregard them. The more they disregard, the 'softer' it is. There's no point talking about those laws, because by definition they are not part of the setting. (I like to think that Felarya is relatively 'hard' compared to other fantasy worlds.)
Felarya has a few of these; giants are a postulate of the setting and thus the square cube law is not a law. | |
|
| |
Archmage_Bael Mara's snack
Posts : 4158 Join date : 2009-05-05 Age : 36 Location : Shatterock Caldera
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:49 am | |
| Exactly. in our world the square cube law is a law, and it would be a problem. In Felarya, it's not because of the setting.If it is still a law there, I think creatures would need to stand far taller than 100 ft, because 100 ft I think would be our 6ft on earth.
Point is it works, because Felarya has it's own rules and limitations that it obeys to keep itself working. | |
|
| |
Shady Knight Lord of the Elements
Posts : 4580 Join date : 2008-01-20 Age : 34
| Subject: Re: General Q and A Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:02 am | |
| Even though everyone already answered it, I feel the need to bring up this quote from CRACKED which pretty much sums it all. - CRACKED wrote:
- "We don't ask that you stay within the bounds of physics, but at least follow the rules you freaking made up."
| |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: General Q and A | |
| |
|
| |
| General Q and A | |
|